The reality is the remnant staff at the Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses is still composed of defeatists, pesticide pushers and ranching sympathizers.
The successful candidate will monitor rangeland conditions and participate in wild horse utilization checks and cattle compliance checks according to the job posting.
A search for John Dematteis associated him with Yak Daddy Ranch in Buffalo, a small town east of the allotment.
Products and services include meat and live sales for starting your own herd.
Yaks were introduced to North America in the early 1900’s according to the site, putting them in the same category as cattle and sheep (not indigenous).
In recent years, Roy transformed the nonprofit into a ranching advocacy group, with heavy reliance on pesticides to achieve the government’s population goals, while the board looked the other way.
Not really.
Her bogus land trust is in an area where livestock are welcomed but horses are not.
The title of largest attempted eradication of wild horses belongs to her for the mass sterilization program on the Virginia Range.
A sigh of relief must have gone up at her departure.
Western Horse Watchers does not know who’s currently driving the bus and if the reduction-in-force is part of a restructuring and rededication to its original mission.
They’re usually not open to observation, interfering with the public’s right to know what their government is doing.
The risks of injury and death, after the gate closes, are similar to those of forcible removal, as the writer of a commentary in Nevada Current points out.
Key responsibilities include managing the executive director’s calendar, inbox triage, meeting preparation, follow-ups and travel logistics according to an undated job posting on Indeed.
Does that mean the executive director is suffering from mental illness or is in a state of cognitive decline?
The Campaign Against America’s Wild Horses and its partner organizations lead the nation in mass sterilization and undying service to the public lands ranchers.
An article by Courthouse News Service does not identify the appellants but they may be permittees on the Stone Cabin allotments.
The case centers around the definition of “immediate,” as in immediate removal of excess animals when overpopulation exists. Refer to §1333(b)(2) in 16 USC 30.
The scoping report says the allotment met Idaho standards for Rangeland Health in 2004 but today it’s in the Improve category.
The parcel offers 567 active AUMs on 4,409 public acres according to the allotment master report, equivalent to 10.7 wild horses per thousand public acres.
Your faithful public servants claim that public lands in the western U.S. can only support one wild horse per thousand acres.
Wild horses can be placed on public lands not identified for their use by acquiring or controlling a base property and flipping its preference to horses.
In this case, there are three permits on the allotment, so you might have to buy several base properties to access all of the AUMs. Not a good idea.
The authorization use report indicates that permit #1104620, held by BILL BERNT, is for horses while the other two are for cattle.
The operator information report at RAS did not show any other authorizations for BILL BERNT, no other permits to graze cattle, sheep or goats.
In its effort to nullify the permits of American Prairie and discourage those who might purchase a base property and convert the associated allotments to a refuge, the BLM claimed in its proposed decision that it cannot issue grazing permits for animals treated as wild or intended to be released into the wild but it can issue permits for animals used in production-oriented operations, or in support thereof, such as horses used to herd cattle.
The operator information report shows no other authorizations for the Millers, no permits to graze cattle, sheep or goats.
So what production-oriented purpose do their horses serve?
Maybe they run cattle on another allotment under a different name.
Do they need 37 horses for that? Must be a big one.
Or maybe their permit doesn’t comply with the agency’s new understanding of the meaning of livestock.
If that’s true, they should be drafting more than one notice of permit cancellation.
Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, believed that contraceptives would be useful in reducing certain undesirable elements in society and avoiding the detrimental effects of overpopulation according to an article by Wikipedia.
So it is today on public lands in the western U.S., with the advocates and their political allies clamoring for wild horse birth control.
What they don’t tell you is that their fertility control vaccines are actually pesticides that sterilize the mares, leading to herd demise.
Like Sanger, who found favor with the eugenicists, the advocates are gaining the respect of those who want the range cleansed of wild horses.
The allotments affected by the decision to cancel the permits authorizing bison and replace them with permits authorizing cattle—an attempt by the BLM to placate the ranchers and discourage those who would weigh the advantages of purchasing a base property and converting the attached allotment(s) to a refuge—are:
The permit information report yielded 7,181 records for Montana, with 41 designated as INDIGENOUS.
Only ten can be associated with the nonprofit. Authorizations marked red in the filtered spreadsheet were granted to others.
That means there are ranchers in the state who may not be engaged in production-oriented operations because their animals do not meet the agency’s ad hoc definition of livestock and are not eligible for grazing permits.
Western Horse Watchers has not seen any news releases announcing a review of grazing authorizations, not just in Montana but across the western U.S., to determine if they comply with applicable laws.
Permits marked INDIGENOUS were found in Colorado, New Mexico and Wyoming.